Developer’s informal allocation of private parking space in the common area
In Faraday House (IO) v Shine Wheel Ltd ([2017] HKEC 957, LT) P was the purchaser of a flat in Faraday House in 1992. The estate was then a new development and she bought from the developer. She wanted...
View ArticleRelief from forfeiture will ordinarily only be granted once during a lease term
In Ramadour Industries Ltd v Bullen ([2017] HKEC 974, CA) L granted T a lease of a house on Lamma Island for a two year term. T fell into arrears with the rent but was granted relief from forfeiture. T...
View ArticleAdverse possession: the significance of a failure to fence rural land
In Winpo Development Ltd v Wong Kar Fu ([2017] HKEC 1093) P sought an order for possession in respect of land occupied by D. D relied on adverse possession in his defence and counterclaim. The claim...
View ArticleInterpretation of DMC apportionment provision and order for sale of...
In Hertford Mansion (Un Chau Street) (IO) v Wong Shing Kwan ([2017] HKEC 1154, DC) the Management Committee of an Owners’ Corporation decided to carry out major renovation works at the property. The...
View ArticleAdverse possession and the Land (Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance
In Chung Chiu Hing v Law Sam ([2017] HKEC 1198) Madam Law was the registered owner of a flat (‘the Flat’). P claimed to have acquired title through adverse possession. The Flat had been sold pursuant...
View ArticleAdverse possession: death of licensor terminates a licence
The facts of Hsieh Haw Shane Gary v Chang Ho Ying ([2017] HKEC 1246) illustrate that a licensor’s death terminates a licence to occupy land. Madam Chang was registered as the owner of a flat (‘the...
View ArticleRepairing covenant and the removal of a handrail from a staircase
In Dodd v Raebarn Estates Ltd ([2017] EWCA Civ 439, CA (Eng)) Mr D was staying in a friend’s first floor flat. He died after falling while walking down the staircase leading from the flat to the ground...
View ArticleCar parking spaces: common parts?
Tai Fat Development (Holding) Co Ltd v Gold King Industrial Building (IO) ([2017] HKEC 1366, CFA) concerned a dispute as to whether or not thirteen car parking spaces in the building were common parts....
View ArticleEasements of necessity
In Manjang v Drammeh ((1990) 61 P & CR 194, PC) R, having already occupied 63 Wellington Street in The Gambia for some time, was granted a lease of it for 21 years from 2 February 1977. R also...
View ArticleSettlement induced by misrepresentation that one of the parties had title to...
In Howin Industrial Ltd v China Group Global Ltd ([2017] HKEC 1485) P transferred land to D2 to D13 for no consideration. D2 to D13 were male indigenous villagers entitled to ding rights. D2 to D13...
View ArticleEquitable ownership of the family home: interaction of the common intention...
The Court of Appeal judgment in Primecredit Ltd v Yeung Chun Pang Barry ([2017] HKEC 1533, CA) deals with several important issues in the law of the ownership of the family home. A husband (‘H’) and...
View ArticleCompelling evidence of post-acquisition variation of common intention
In Chan Ling Ling v Chan Ching Kit ([2017] HKEC 1474) property was held by four siblings as tenants in common. The common intention at the time of acquisition was they would have equal shares. The...
View ArticleEquitable ownership: single framework for ‘domestic consumer’ and...
Marr v Collie ([2017] UKPC 17) is an important Privy Council decision re-stating the framework for deciding when equitable ownership differs from the ownership position as revealed by the legal title....
View ArticleAdverse possession: intention to possess when squatter was a licensee
In Jin Yu Chia v Personal Representatives of Lee Ah Hsin ([2017] HKEC 1829) the plaintiff lived with the registered owner of a flat from 1991 onwards. The plaintiff claimed that the relationship was...
View ArticleObjective nature of the intention to possess: where the squatter believed...
In Pang Yiu Chor v Wong Wai Leung ([2017] HKEC 1874) the Government mistakenly believed itself to be the owner of land in Fanling. In fact, the land belonged to the plaintiffs. The Government granted...
View ArticleAdverse possession: the slightest act of the paper owner sufficient to retain...
Tierra Trading Ltd v Land Base Ltd ([2017] HKEC 1809) was an adverse dispute between neighbours. The disputed land comprised landings and staircases between the neighbouring buildings. The plaintiffs...
View ArticleVariation of an express trust or a common intention constructive trust
In Insol Funding Company Ltd v Cowlam ([2017] EWHC 1822 (Ch)) Ms Cowlam and Mr Cowey began to co-habit in 1994 and had a son in 1995. They lived in a property owned by Ms Cowlam. They sold it and in...
View ArticleEquitable subrogation: one co-habitee charging interest to secured creditor...
In Insol Funding Company Limited v Cowlam ([2017] EWHC 1822 (Ch)) Ms Cowlam and Mr Cowey were equitable tenants in common of their family home. Mr Cowey gave his creditors (Insol) an equitable charge...
View ArticleSeminar about proprietary estoppel and the family home at CUHK Faculty of Law
We will run a seminar about the English Court of Appeal decision in Liden v Burton. Details are as follows: Session A: Date: 17 October 2017 (Tuesday) Time: 1:00 – 3:00 pm Venue: Classroom 3, CUHK...
View ArticleThe equity of exoneration: tenant in common charging her share to protect...
Insol Funding Company Limited v Cowlam ([2017] EWHC 1822 (Ch)) also raised the question of the equity of exoneration. Ms Cowlam co-habited with Mr Cowey. They were equitable tenants in common of the...
View Article