Uncontroverted claim of breach of DMC: grant of an injunction
In Park Vale (Management) Ltd v Tang Wing Kin ([2013] HKEC 342, LT) Park Vale was the manager of a residential estate and T was the owner of one of the flats on the estate. Park Vale adduced evidence...
View ArticleInsufficient evidence of possession and intention to possess
In Tang Ching v Wu Wan Yau ([2013] HKEC 363, CFI) T claimed to have been in adverse possession of W’s land since 1976. He claimed that his possession had initially been under the terms of an oral...
View ArticleTerms of agreement meant that there was no exclusive possession
In Westminster City Council v Clarke ([1992] 2 A.C. 288, HL) the council and C entered into an agreement that gave C the right to occupy a room in a hostel for homeless, single men. Some of the...
View ArticleStreet v Mountford
Introduction Lord Templeman’s judgment in Street v Mountford ([1985] A.C. 809) was an authoritative restatement of the defining characteristics of a lease. It provided clarity as to the factors that...
View Article‘Employment agreement’ a disguised tenancy: failure to plead the terms of the...
In Chau Yu v Kwan Chuen Kuen (No 2) ([1964] HKLR 309, CA) P was the tenant of some shop premises. P had entered into an employment agreement with D under which D was to manage the menswear department...
View ArticleWeekly review: 18th – 22nd March 2013
Adverse possession: possession There is no adverse possession where there is insufficient evidence of possession itself (Tang Ching v Wu Wan Yau) Leases: essential elements When seeking to argue that...
View ArticleService occupancy: must the occupancy be necessary or is it enough that it be...
In Glasgow Corporation v Johnstone ([1965] A.C. 609, HL) a full-time church officer was required by the terms of his employment to occupy a house next to the church. The house was part of the same...
View ArticleLicence of houses on school grounds: necessary to performance of teacher’s...
In Commissioners of Valuation for Northern Ireland v Fermanagh Protestant Board of Education ([1969] 1 W.L.R. 1708, HL) school teachers had licences of houses in the school grounds. There was no...
View ArticleService occupancy: meaning of ‘for the better performance’ of duties
In Wragg v Surrey County Council ([2008] EWCA Civ. 19, CA (Eng)) W was a countryside ranger employed by the Council to carry out duties relating to the management and conservation of areas of common...
View ArticleService occupancy: tenancy or not?
In Fox v Dalby ((1874 – 75) L.R. 10 C.P. 285) D was a sergeant in the army. He was required by army rules to live in a house near stores where ammunition and equipment were kept if his commanding...
View ArticleWeekly review: 25th – 28th March 2013
Leases: licences: possession: service occupancy An employee’s occupation of property of his employer is in possession if either (i) the occupation was necessary for the performance of his duties as...
View ArticleService occupancy: requirement arising from terms of service
In Langley v Appleby ([1976] 3 All E.R. 391) the question (for tax purposes) was whether police officers were ‘occupiers’ of rent-free accommodation provided by the police force. There was no express...
View ArticleTrustees ordered to hand over compensation payable on resumption
In Howin Industrial Ltd v Li Koon Lin ([2013] HKEC 372, CFI) P divided property it owned into sections and assigned one section to each of the defendants (to make use of their rights as indigenous...
View ArticleService occupier: what if the relevant work began after the employment...
In Norris v Checksfield ([1991] 1 W.L.R. 1241, CA (Eng)) N employed C as a semi-skilled mechanic. A little later N asked C whether he would like to live in N’s bungalow. The conditions were that he...
View ArticleWeekly Review: 2nd – 5th April
Leases: licences: possession: service occupancy When it is contended that occupation of a particular property is essential for the performance of the employee’s duties, it must be established that only...
View ArticleAdverse possession: limitation period; abandonment of possession?
In Law Bing Kee v Person(s) in occupation of RP ([2013] HKEC 405, CFI) P was the registered owner of the disputed land (part of a larger portion owned by him). D’s predecessor as owner of neighbouring...
View ArticleConstruction of ‘curtilage’ covenant in Government lease
In New Mercury Holdings Corp v Secretary for Justice ([2013] HKEC 435, CFI) P wanted to re-develop the residential properties on sites it owned. It sought a declaration that the government should...
View ArticleFaulty sub-DMC: rectification
In Re Lee Mei Yan Kris ([2013] HKEC 382, CFI) a flat was owned by three people as tenants in common in equal shares. The flat was partitioned in 1980. A sub-DMC was entered into but this failed to...
View ArticleBreach of DMC: landlord’s liability for tenant’s use of common areas
In 海怡閣(成和道) 業主立案法團v 泓璟集團有限公司 ([2013] HKEC 345, LT) L was the registered owner of shops forming part of a building. It permitted its tenant to use the adjoining common parts (though it did not purport...
View ArticleLandlord’s failure to give vacant possession: tenant’s duty to mitigate and...
In Mega Yield International Holdings Ltd v Fonfair Co Ltd ([2013] HKEC 313, CFI) D entered into an option to grant a lease to P. The option was exercised but D was unable to give vacant possession of...
View Article