One millionth view
The number of views of this blog went through the one million mark early this morning. Here is the link to a screenshot Michael Lower
View ArticleMortgage or not: look at the substance of the transaction
In Warnborough Ltd v Garmite Ltd ([2003] Civ 1544, CA (Eng)) W sold property to G but the entire purchase price was left oustanding. G granted W a legal charge to secure the outstanding balance of the...
View ArticleProprietary estoppel: co-habitees
In Liden v Burton ([2016] EWCA Civ 275) B and L co-habited in B’s home for twelve years until they broke up in 2013. B’s home was mortgaged and he was concerned that he would not be able to keep up...
View ArticleGood title: not affected by ‘fanciful’ risks of a successful legal challenge
In Jovian Corporate Communications Ltd v Link Wide International Investment Ltd ([2016] HKEC 808, CA) the dispute arose out of a contract for the sale of an office unit. The building had been jointly...
View ArticleUnlawful holding over: meaning of possession and calculating mesne profits
In Fordtime Industrial Ltd v Yip Shing Lam ([2016] HKEC 812, LT) the tenant of a cockloft unlawfully held over at the end of the tenancy. After a dispute lasting several years, it wrote to its former...
View ArticleRegistration of a personal loan agreement unjustified
In Flat 4 on 3/F of Block A, Tin Yau Court, No 1 Tin Shing Road, Tin Shui Wai, Yuen Long, New Territories ([2016] HKEC 751, CFI) title to the property had been in the joint names of a husband and wife....
View ArticleBurns v Burns: unmarried cohabitees, title to family home in sole name
In Burns v Burns ([1984] Ch. 317, CA (Eng)) the couple were unmarried (though the woman had changed her family name to be the same as her partner’s). They lived together for two years and had a child...
View ArticleProving the existence of a common intention constructive trust
In Ip Man Shan v Ching Hing Construction Co Ltd ([2005] HKEC 188, CA) ICP paid for land but he channeled the payment through his company (Ching Hing). Ching Hing then paid the construction costs for...
View ArticleProprietary estoppel: expectations and proportionality
In Davies v Davies ([2016] EWCA Civ 643, CA (Eng)) a couple owned a farm. E, the second of three daughters, lived with the parents for much of the time up to the time of her final falling out with...
View ArticleNon-registration of trust. Dispositions to defraud creditors
In Goldfame Consultants Ltd v Tse Sai Ming ([2016] HKEC 1113, CFI) TCS agreed to sell land to Goldfame. The contract provided for the payment of deposits and then for the payment of the balance of the...
View ArticleSpecific performance: ready willing and able; hardship; calculating damages
In Siu Wei v Ng Ying Ying ([2016] HKEC 1162, CFI) S and P entered into a provisional sale and purchase agreement for the sale and purchase of property. S later decided that she wanted to keep the...
View ArticleWhite v White: the equality ‘yardstick’
In White v White ([2001] 1 AC 596, HL) a couple divorced after thirty years of marriage. The appeal concerned the ancillary financial relief proceedings. This was a case where the couple’s joint assets...
View ArticleEstablishing a common intention constructive trust
In Fung Oi Ha v Fung Pui On ([2016] HKEC 1272, CFI) the title to a family home was in the father’s name. In 2005, the father assigned the home into the names of himself and his son as joint tenants. In...
View ArticleLKW v DD -‘equal sharing’ principle
In LKW v DD ((2010) 13 HKCFAR 537) the Court of Final Appeal had to deal with the issue of the division of assets between a divorcing couple where the available assets exceeded the parties’ needs....
View ArticleAustralia: presumption of beneficial joint tenancy where both spouses...
In Trustees of Property of Cummins v Cummins ([2006] HCA 6) title to a married couple’s family home was held by them as legal joint tenants. The wife had contributed two thirds of the purchase price....
View ArticleWhether a right to set aside a transaction bound third party mortgagee (England)
In Mortgage Express v Lambert ([2016] EWCA Civ 555, CA (Eng)) L agreed to sell her property to S and C. She had a right to set this transaction set aside on the grounds that it was an unconscionable...
View ArticleImplied grant of easements
In Collins v Collins (No 2) ([2015] EWHC 2652; [2016] 2 P & C.R. 6) a mother and father executed a deed of trust of agricultural land. The beneficiaries were themselves and their three sons. At the...
View ArticleProperty acquired in contemplation of marriage
In Tsun Kok Chung Richard v Lee Chun Yu ([2016] HKEC 1482, CFI) P and D intended to get married. P bought a flat to be the matrimonial home and it was conveyed into the names of P and D as joint...
View ArticleProprietary estoppel: genuine belief but no assurance
McGuiness v Preece ([2016] EWHC 1518 (Ch)) concerned a son’s claim to land owned by his parents. The parents had established a family business in which their four children worked. The parents...
View ArticleOral variation of contract despite clause requiring variations to be in writing
In MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd ([2016] EWCA Civ 553 , CA(Eng)) Rock was the licensee of business premises managed by MWB. Rock fell into arrears with the payments due under...
View Article